Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a single-competing guest.

1. From August 16, 2018 to around 23:35, the Defendant damaged the Cheongju-si’s Cheongju-si’s Cheongju-si’s Cheongju-si’s Cheongju-si’s Da ( South, 58 years of age) by drinking in the Moel operated by the Bel, and without finding one’s own accommodation, the Defendant caused the 300,000 won of the market price to fall.

2. On August 17, 2018, around 00:19, at around 112, 2018, the victim H (52 taxes, south, and South) of the G global group, who was called out after receiving a report that the 112-report was damaged by the franchise of the above Bel, discovered the Defendant who was used in the stairs between the second and third floors of the building, and committed assault, i.e., e., e., e., e., the back of the body of the G global group, due to a defect in hearing the situation at the time, two times at a time and two sides of the two sides of the latter.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to I and D;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. On-site photographs, and photographs of damage;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning receipt for damage to property;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying property) and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Each crime of the judgment below with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is not likely to be a crime committed by the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, by destroying a reading center book, and by assaulting a police officer dispatched upon receiving a report. Do’s mistake is recognized and reflects that the Defendant has no record of committing any crime. Do’s punishment is determined as ordered by taking account of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.