logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.08.13 2017구단36703
체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 15, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for permission to change the status of stay (D-2) to a general training (D-4) on the ground that the Plaintiff, as a foreigner of the nationality of Mongolian Republic of Korea, entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status and staying in the Republic of Korea, would receive training in Korean language at the C University located in Ansan-si B, and on June 10, 2015, he/she obtained the permission to change the status of stay from the Defendant as a general training, was granted three times extension of the period of stay, and stayed in the Republic of Korea on the ground that he/she would complete the social welfare master degree course at C University (hereinafter “instant application”).

Since it has been decided not to permit the extension of the period of stay, etc. for which you have applied for under Article 33 of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act, he shall notify his departure by the designated departure deadline.

Y200 1. 1. 1. 33. 1. 3. 1. 1. 3. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 1. 1. 1. 3. 3. 3. 3. 1. 1. 1. 1.

On February 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) conducted a fact-finding survey on the Plaintiff; and (b) stated the grounds for refusal in the form of “decision on refusal of the extension of sojourn period, etc.” in attached Form 43 of the Enforcement Rule of the Immigration Control Act; (c) stated the grounds for refusal as “insufficient financial capacity, etc.”; and (d) stated the details of the main text as follows, and then issued the notice to the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant notice”). C.

The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking revocation of the instant notification on December 12, 2017, by deeming that the instant notification constitutes a decision not to permit the change of status of stay responding to the instant application.

The defendant shall again conduct a fact-finding survey on the plaintiff while the lawsuit in this case is pending, and Attached Form 43-2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Immigration Control Act on July 16, 2018.

arrow