1. Certificates No. 102, No. 102, 2014, written by the Defendant against C by a notary public of D General Law Office.

In light of the absence of dispute between the parties or comprehensively taking account of the evidence evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Defendant’s seizure of each of the items listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff on December 9, 2015, based on the notarial deeds No. 102 of 2014 and the executory exemplification of this Court Decision No. 2014Da31324 decided Aug. 11, 2015.

Attached Form

Since the execution of seizure of each item indicated in the list is illegal because it is against an article not owned by the obligor C, the Plaintiff, as the owner of the article, may seek the exclusion of the above compulsory execution against the Defendant.