1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion B, via the Hanjin Heavy Industries, performed a construction work to extract and transplant trees in the vicinity of 14,258 square meters of the miscellaneous land in the Army located in the Army B from August 15, 2015 to August 30, 2015 (hereinafter “instant land”).

In the instant land, five persons, including D, who were the general secretary of the Plaintiff, were laid to the instant grave on September 13, 2015, and discovered the fact that the instant grave was damaged or lost.

① 원고가 위 공사를 진행한 한진중공업의 공사 책임자에 물어보니, 이 사건 묘는 위 공사 당시 이미 훼손 및 유실된 상태였다고 하는 점, ② 원고육군 B 관계자한진중공업 직원이 2015. 9. 14.부터 2015. 9. 18.까지 이 사건 토지 주변을 확인하였음에도 이 사건 묘를 발견하지 못한 점, ③ 육군 B에서 2014.경 봉분 없는 묘지의 훼손 사건을 야기하였음에도 병사들로 하여금 팻말을 설치하고 관리하게 하는 등 어떠한 재발방지책도 실시하지 않은 점 등에 비추어 이 사건 묘의 훼손 및 유실에 대한 책임은 피고에 있다.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 50,000,000 won to the plaintiff.

2. It is not enough to recognize that there was a grave in this case on the land of this case only with only a single stop stop and a statement of evidence of Gap 1 to 4 (including each number), and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Even if the instant grave existed on the instant land, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff damaged the instant grave.

Rather, the following circumstances acknowledged based on the descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings are as follows. ① In the Army B, the current status of the tombates regularly visited by civilians, and ② in the Army B, after reporting the reburial of unclaimed graves, if any, in the Army B, after reporting the reburial of unclaimed graves.