The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant, who is not aware of whether he is subject to permission from the competent authorities, is led to each of the development activities in this case; (b) some of his restorations, such as walking aggregate that was known to the Kimhae-siF; and (c) the Defendant is the aged 69 years of age, etc., the Defendant’s imprisonment (two years of suspension of execution in four months of imprisonment and two months of imprisonment) declared by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the instant crimes is to be considered: (a) each of the instant crimes is to build two buildings with the structure of the prefabricated panel structure (64m24m2) and one container (15m2) in Kim Sea-si and E, an urban planning zone, without obtaining permission from the Kim Sea market from December 2009 to May 201; (b) remove aggregate in F, D, E, approximately 2,400m2; (c) alter the form and quality of land by spreading aggregate; and (d) remove steel structures, such as H beam beam, etc.; (c) remove steel structures, etc.; (d) without obtaining permission for development activities from the Kim Sea-si to May 2012, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant as acts seriously impeding the efficient management of land; and (d) the Defendant did not present any objective data to restore the original state to the original state and present state, such as the fact that some of the Defendant did not have made any reply to the development activities in question.