logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.18 2014노2263
상해
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The grounds for appeal by the defendant are erroneous in matters of law (as to the part of the crime), and the defendant was unilaterally assaulted by the victim, and the defendant was not guilty of the crime of assault, even though he was not able to bread the victim's kn't with her kn't, as stated in the facts of the crime as

The punishment of the court below (the fine of 500,000 won) sentenced by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

Although it is possible to find out the fact that the defendant had inflicted an injury on the part of the fifth balance of 5 weeks near the part that needs to be treated for about 5 weeks after the defendant walking the victim's fault by a mistake of facts (as to the acquittal portion of the defendant), the court below's decision that the crime of injury cannot be recognized is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts.

The punishment of the court below (the fine of 500,000 won) sentenced by the court below on the defendant is too uneasible and unfair.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the court below's decision on the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts, ① the victim is arguing with F from the police investigation to the court below's court. The defendant is also breading the defendant as he tree, and his her breath with breath, breathing breath, and consistently stated its circumstances. ② G at the time of this case stated that "the defendant and the victim had breath in breath (e.g., 58 pages, 60 pages)" while stating that "the defendant and the victim had breath in breath (e.g., 61 pages)." At the time of the court below's decision, the witness stated that "the defendant had f1th in f1th of the trial record" and stated that "the defendant and the victim were breathdd with the defendant and the victim" at the time of a telephone investigation agency, and that the victim was removed (e.g., evidence record)"., the defendant's act.

arrow