A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 24, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of four million won by a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on September 24, 2009, and on January 6, 2010, the same court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., and on August 21, 2013, the same court was sentenced to eight months of suspended execution and two years of suspended execution due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and was sentenced to two or more times of suspended execution as of August 29, 2013, and was engaged in driving of C-learning passenger vehicles.

At around 16:20 on September 8, 2013, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content of 0.080%, led to the Defendant to drive the said motor vehicle and drive the said motor vehicle with a distance of 4 lanes at a point of 104.2km in the Do Ri of the Gyeongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Gyeongnam-gu, Gyeongnam-do along the speed of 80km at the speed of 100km from the port of Busan to the port of Busan.

The Defendant did not secure the safety distance to avoid the stop of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the same direction without securing the safety distance to avoid the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the same direction, and found and found it late after the rapid stop of the said vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the same direction, and caused the negligence of checking the above E and checking the part of the back part of the vehicle in front of the said vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the above grade, and the latter part of the vehicle in front of the victim F (e.g., 50 years old) by checking the shock part of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the same direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above business, puts the victim H (73 years old), I (69 years old), and I (69 years old) to K (5 years old) who took advantage of the victim D and examination mar for about two weeks of treatment, such as cryp salt fat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the J (44 years old) who took advantage of the same vehicle for about two weeks of treatment.