logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.10.29 2015고단1299
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 06:04 on August 7, 2015, the Defendant was a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle B in driving a motor vehicle, and was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.214% on the 0.214% on the right side of Pyeongtaek-si, and the Defendant was driving in the right side from the right side of the road through which the width of the road is narrow and the passage of pedestrians is frequent. As such, the Defendant was a place where the traffic of pedestrians is frequent, and thus, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely proceed by checking whether there is a pedestrian by checking whether there is a breath, without driving the vehicle, while neglecting the duty of care. However, the Defendant did not immediately stop the bridge of the victim D (n, 60 years of age) who was walking at the right side of the motor vehicle, and went beyond the upper part of the above 8 weeks on the right side of the motor vehicle and did not take necessary measures such as rescueing the victim’s bones of the right side, etc.

2. On August 7, 2015, at around 06:05, the Defendant was driving along the road for one-way traffic in front of Pyeongtaek-si from the parallel parallel to the parallel parallel. In such a case, despite the duty of care, such as the statement in paragraph (1), the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so, led the Defendant to the victim E (45 years old) driving in the right direction to booming down the pent part of the victim E (45 years old) driving in the right direction without stopping, resulting in the Defendant’s injury to the victim, such as a shoulder dump, which requires treatment for about two weeks in front of the left side of the vehicle of the Defendant, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the pent-way repair cost of KRW 1,422,925, such as the front pent-si exchange, and does not immediately stop the vehicle and does not take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.Each of D and E.

arrow