logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2017.11.10 2017고정68
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:25, the victim D’s 205 heading room in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) the Defendant would be notified of dismissal from the Defendant’s office while drinking together with F of the head of the work site, the Defendant’s work site; and (c) the number of garbage sources containing small-scale bottles installed on the wall inside the said heading room.

A set of TV booms on TV, protruding off in the bag, and boomed off the said TV, thereby damaging the said TV at the market price equivalent to 12.30,000 won, which is owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant: (a) was notified of the dismissal from the above F at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and at the above time; (b) caused the said victim’s injury by cutting off the main room with the tele corridor operated by the said victim D; (c) was sent back by the said F to the heading room, 206, next to the Defendant; and (d) subsequently, the door door was set up several times in the future, and, (e) obstructed the said victim’s business by force, such as putting about one-hour large amount of rain, such as “hing down, fasth and down down at the inside of the Republic of Korea,” and passing down together with the bath, she interfered with the said victim’s business operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

The defendant asserts to the effect that the defendant did not have any intention to destroy property, each of the police statements made by the defendant in his/her part in his/her court, the defendant in his/her own police interrogation protocol F, and each of the police interrogation protocol made by him/her in his/her own police interrogation protocol.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following circumstances are recognized.

(1) The defendant was together with the defendant

F made a statement to the effect that “F was putting his empty Surine in a garbage box, and this Defendant was surved with TV flabed in TV flabed by the blabrick in a brea and approximately two meters away from TV.”

② The Defendant also knew of the fact that he had been suffering from a fluorous disease on the part of the police, and caused the fluoricul to TV.

arrow