logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.11.23 2016고단1289 (1)
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of 1 year and 6 months, Defendant B and C, and Defendant D and E, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 12, 2007, Defendants A, B, C, and D’s bidding interference with the same business was established with Defendant A as the representative director, and two or more companies among themselves participate in the early, middle, and high school meal ingredients supply contract electronic tendering in the Guldong-gun, the Guldong-gun, the Guldong-gun, and the school meal service supply contract, and are engaged in the business. However, they were engaged in the business by participating in the early, middle, and high school meal ingredients supply contract electronic tendering in the Guldong-gun, the bid price rate is low or the bid price rate is low, and they are unable to participate in the bidding at the Gu and the Gu are limited in the early, middle, and high school. After reporting the food service sales business by establishing a formal business with the former area at the location of the Gu, two or more companies among them are recruited to increase the bid price rate by participating in the same bidding.

According to the above public offering, the Defendants registered Defendant B as the representative director and Defendant D director on January 20, 2012, and established the Food Product Distribution Business Council, which is a meal service facility, around April 1, 2013, and reported food service facility food sales business by opening L companies under the name of K, which is a field management and delivery employee of the Dispute Resolution Bank I, and around January 26, 2016, the Defendants opened the food service facility sales business in the name of M as the representative of Defendant C and reported food service facility sales business.

After the Defendants made a document-based company in consecutive order, Defendant A, as the representative director of the Fund for the Settlement of Disputes, shall be in charge of overall management affairs of the company, including a bid in the name of the Fund for the Settlement of Disputes and L, and Defendant B shall be in charge of management of the business affairs after the bid and the successful bid in the name of the Fund for the Settlement of Disputes, Defendant C shall be in charge of the accounting management of the I and document-based companies, and Defendant D shall be in charge of the external affairs

arrow