logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.12.14 2017고단3032
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) calls to the victim B who made a job with friendship from the fact-finding on August 24, 2015; and (b) calls to obtain a loan of KRW 110 million on the need of business funds; and (c) provides a written guarantee to pay a loan after three months.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was unable to repay KRW 20,000,000,000 from the previous capital, and was unable to pay the profits because it was difficult to operate the principal house. Since there was no particular property or income, there was no intention or ability to pay the amount properly even if the Defendant established the victim as a guarantor and received the above money from the lending company.

The defendant received a total of KRW 110 million from 10,000,000 from 10 loan companies, such as a loan by the defendant in the same day, for the defendant, the defendant did not enter into a joint and several guarantee contract with the loan companies for the defendant, and did not pay the above loan at time, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the above amount.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On December 2015, the Defendant is in need of money to obtain one more studio and studio from the above victim by telephone from the above victim at the superscopic scopic scopic.

It shall be returned only for three months.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, at the time, the Defendant, like the above 1. Paragraph 1., was unable to make profits from the Defendant’s debt that he borrowed from the capital company or the lending company due to difficulties in managing the son’s house and the house. Since there was no particular property or income, there was no intention or ability to make timely repayment even if he borrowed the above money from the damaged party.

The Defendant is the sum of KRW 50 million from the injured party on December 2, 2015, KRW 50 million, KRW 50 million on December 3, 2015, KRW 24 million on February 15, 2016, and KRW 57.4 million on February 15, 2016.

arrow