1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a constructor specialized in the construction of green studio (the work room removed from the fine dust to manufacture semiconductor elements or integrated circuits) with the trade name of “C”. The non-party D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) is a company that manufactures and sells semiconductors and flat display-related equipment, and the non-party F (hereinafter “F”) is a corporation established in China’s local area.

B. F in alliance with the construction of the non-party 1, 2, and 3 of the Madong-si Madong-si in China (hereinafter “F”) operated the cudio construction in the instant case.

C. After employing G, the Plaintiff was dispatched to the studio construction site of the instant case. G was on duty from December 17, 201 to May 29, 2012 at the said site and returned to Korea.

On March 23, 2012, the Plaintiff, a director and director of D, drafted a contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant service contract”) under the following terms and conditions (Article A, 1; hereinafter “instant service contract”) (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

Contract

1. Name of the construction: Management of the studio construction work;

2. Place: A well-dying factory in a Chinese Madong-dong-si.

3. Term of contract: The contract amount shall be KRW 200,000,000 per day (200,000) from December 1, 2011 to April 30, 2012 shall be the total amount of KRW 200,000,000 per day (100,000) shall be paid at a local corporation of China, and the daily amount of KRW 100,000,000 (10,000,000) shall be paid every month from April to April.

The Parties conclude a contract with the foregoing content and the separate contract terms and conditions, and draw up the contract: On March 23, 2012, the address of Party A: The name of the H2 floor in the Gyeong-si, Chungcheongnam-si: the address of the Defendant (B): The name of the Defendant (B): The representative of Party C (A).

E. 1) The Plaintiff filed the instant prior suit against D with the Seogu District Court Decision 2012Gahap3402 (hereinafter “instant prior suit”).

In the above lawsuit, E claimed the payment of service costs under the instant service contract, the right of representation for the Defendant in relation to the instant service contract.