(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.17 2016고정2196

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.17 2016고정2196

업무상과실자동차전복

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Cro-cab.

On March 21, 2016, the Defendant driving the above vehicle around 04:45, and driving the three-lanes of the three-lanes in front of the film elementary school in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, according to the border of Suwon-si, and driving the three-lanes of the three-lanes in front of the film elementary school in front of the 832-lanes from the

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to change the vehicle line safely by taking into account the traffic situation of the lane that will change the course prior to the change of course.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and changed course to a two-lane or a three-lane as it is, by negligence, the victim D, who proceeded along three-lanes in the same direction as it is, received the front part of the left side of the vehicle of the defendant as the front part of the defendant's vehicle.

After all, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, moved to the motor vehicle where the victim is in existence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 189 (2) and 187 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, considering all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant, on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, is deemed to have been led to the commission of the crime, and the victim D’s negligence appears to have been omitted in light of the details and content of the crime in this case, and

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2016.11.17. 선고 2016고정2196 판결

-수원지방법원 2017.06.23 2016노8420

-수원지방법원 2017.6.23. 선고 2016노8420 판결

-수원지방법원 2018.08.30 2017나85634

-수원지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고정2857