logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.26 2018나3013
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the judgment of the court of first instance, is that “A No. 6 (Business Agreement and Agency Business Agreement)” is stipulated in Article 25(2) of the Business Agreement and Agency Business Contract concluded between the defendant and the Asian Trust Co., Ltd. on the ground that “if the defendant requests the cancellation of the trust to the buyer for the transfer of ownership, the Asian Trust Co., Ltd. may allow the buyer to transfer ownership at the same time as the trust is terminated, or the Asian Trust Co., Ltd. may directly transfer ownership to the buyer to the buyer on its own,” and thus, it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that it is stated as “...........”

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow