1. The Defendants are each shares in the share transfer column in the separate sheet among the shares to be transferred in the attached sheet among the shares in AP 2,992 square meters in the city of official residence to the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant 1 through 32, 34 through 39

A. (1) The plaintiff's clan purchased the 23th hand AP response 2,92 square meters of AP response around 1959 as a common vessel, and the name of the defendant's clan entrusted to AT, AU, AV, and AW for the same share.

Defendant 1 to 32, 34 to 39 are the successors of the above trustee.

Dod Plaintiff’s clan decided to terminate the title trust of each of the instant real estate at the clan meeting held on May 13, 2017 and to transfer the ownership in the name of the Plaintiff clan, and notified the said Defendants thereof.

Thus, the above Defendants are obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration based on the termination of title trust on May 13, 2017 with respect to each of the shares listed in [Attachment 1 through 3] out of each of the instant real estate inherited from the trustee to the Plaintiff.

B. (i) Grounds for recognition: Defendant 1 through 24, 28, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, and 39 of the Civil Procedure Act: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) (i) of the Civil Procedure Act; and (ii) Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) (i) of the said Act; and (ii) Articles 208(3)3 and 194 of the said Act;

2. Defendant 33. Determination on the claim against AI

A. (1) The AW, a 1/4 share holder of the AP 2,92 square meters (hereinafter “the instant forest”) in the main point of the Defendant AI’s assertion, is not a member of the Plaintiff’s clan.

Therefore, the forest land of this case shall be deemed to be the real estate that is rare for the clan to gather the upper group of the plaintiff's 23 years old descendants than the "AS" of the plaintiff's 23 years old descendants, and the plaintiff's clan is merely a subordinate organization and is not a clan but a similar organization with its unique meaning, and therefore, the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed unfairly.

⑵ 판 단 ㈎ 관련 법리 고유의 의미의 종중이란 공동선조의 후손들에 의하여 그 선조의 분묘수호 및 봉제사와...