logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.04.18 2014노510
성폭력범죄의처벌및피해자보호등에관한법률위반(특수강도강간등)등
Text

Of the judgment of the first instance, the part on the defendant and the part on the first offense of the judgment of the second instance on the defendant's case.

Reasons

1. Progress of lawsuit and scope of adjudication of this court;

A. The proceedings of a lawsuit are as follows: ① Cases involving A and a person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as “defendant”) are as follows: (a) Cases involving the Seoul Southern District Court 2012 high-level857, 2012 high-level 909 (Joint) and 2012 high-level 857, 2012 high-level 35 (Joint) cases against A; and (b) Cases concerning the Defendants’ 2012 high-level 2012 high-level 909 cases against the Defendant; and (c) both of the aforementioned cases are as follows: “the first lower court”; (d) 2012 high-level 857, 2012 high-level 209 high-level 909 (Joint) and high-level 35 (Joint) cases concerning robbery; and (e) 2012 high-level 201 high-level 201 high-level 35 (Joint) of Rape, etc.”).

The judgment of the first instance was found guilty of both crimes A and the defendant, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, and 10 years, and 10 years, respectively. The judgment of the second instance was sentenced to imprisonment of 7 years, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 2 years, 20 years, and 20 years, respectively.

On the first judgment, A appealed on the ground of unfair sentencing, unfair disclosure and notification order, and unfair attachment order for an electronic tracking device, on the grounds of mistake of facts, unfair sentencing, and unfair disclosure and notification order, and the Defendant appealed on the second judgment on the grounds of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, unfair sentencing, and unfair attachment order for an electronic tracking device.

arrow