A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Jeonju District Court's branch court's regular support on December 2, 201, and on January 29, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime in the same court.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle B’s “SM5” vehicle.

On February 11, 2019, at around 00:00, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.144%, and driven the car at a speed of about 20km per hour from D to E University in the direction of E University from D in the direction of the five-lane ahead of the Cal-distance in the Yansan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At the time of night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving a motor vehicle by checking well the right and the right of the person engaged in driving.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol as above, the Defendant stopped on a red signal at the front side of the vehicle driving and stopped on the signal at the front side, and received the part on the right side of the victim F(the age of 46)'s G "Yoldo" car, and then received the part on the right part before the left side of the vehicle driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as above, destroyed the victim’s car to cover KRW 1,001,550 of the repair cost, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

2. Around 00:10 on February 11, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, driven a motor vehicle on the part of the Defendant’s driving within approximately 10km from the 10km road in front of the mutual infinite-dong, Samcheon-gu, Samcheon-gun, Jeonju-do to the motorway located in H.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.