The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who drives a corporation or taxi.

On June 2, 2012, around 01:50 on June 2, 2012, the Defendant came to turn to the left at a speed of about 10km from the direction of the street to the direction of the atomic distance.

Since there is an intersection in which traffic signals are installed and traffic is controlled, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by operating as ordered by the traffic signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of violating and proceeding the stop signal while neglecting this, the front part of the D Driving E in the direction of the Nowon-gu Road in the direction of the Nowon-gu Road in the direction of the Nowon-gu Road was collisioned with the front part of the left side of the Defendant Driving Vehicle.

Accordingly, the victim F (30 years of age) who was on board the victim's driver's vehicle suffered approximately two-day medical treatment, such as booms, from the victim G (53 years of age) who is the passenger of the defendant's vehicle, about two-day medical treatment.

2. According to the provisions of Articles 3(2)1 and 4(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, in the case of operating a vehicle in violation of signals by signal apparatus, a public prosecution may be instituted even in the case of operating a vehicle in violation of signals by signal apparatus under the provisions of Article 4(1) of

That is, when operating in violation of signals by signal apparatus, the term "in the case of operating in violation of signals" means the case where a violation of signals directly causes the occurrence of traffic accidents.

According to the evidence submitted, such as notification of the results of the traffic accident analysis, the fact that the defendant was trying to turn to the left at the time of the accident at the crosswalk stop line at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident is recognized as the collision with the damaged vehicle, which is the direct-in vehicle, the defendant was trying to turn to the left.

However, the video-recordings and the video-recordings, respectively.