logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.05 2014나28564
노임
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. In full view of the purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Gap evidence 2-2, and evidence 3-1 through 4-4, the defendant registered as Eul's trade name and operated the above company together with the co-defendant C in the first instance trial. The plaintiff was entrusted by Eul from August 2012 to February 13, 2013 with an unreceptproof landscaping construction among the remodeling construction of the building located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul E, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, and the unrecover construction among the remodeling construction of the building located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter "each construction of this case"). The defendant transferred KRW 6,00,000 to the plaintiff's bank account on August 13, 2012, and the plaintiff used it for the payment of wages generated by each construction of this case, and the plaintiff did not receive any wages of KRW 19,687,700 from each of the construction of this case until now.

B. According to the above facts, the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with C to pay the Plaintiff unpaid wages of KRW 19,687,700, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from March 1, 2014 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the service of the payment order of this case sought by the Plaintiff, as the operator of D, after the completion of each construction of this case.

I would like to say.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is justified, and the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow