1. The defendant has completed the acquisition by prescription on April 9, 1979 with respect to each forest listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

1. The fact that the Plaintiff occupied each forest land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each forest of this case”) from April 9, 1959 to the date of the closing of argument in this case, in a peaceful and open possession of the forest land as owned by the Plaintiff is not a dispute between the parties.

Therefore, the Plaintiff acquired the woodland of this case by prescription.

Therefore, the defendant, who is the owner of each forest of this case, is obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for reasons of acquisition on April 9, 1979, which is clear from the calendar point of time when 20 years have elapsed since the above possession commencement date for each forest of this case to the plaintiff.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by allowing each party to bear the costs of lawsuit pursuant to Article 99 of the Civil Procedure Act.