1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Details of the disposition;

A. While the Plaintiff was in charge of the construction of the outer team at the construction site of the Jeonju Innovation City Rural Development Administration (hereinafter “the construction site of this case”), which was executed by the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) under a subcontract from GS Construction, the Plaintiff suffered from damage to the outer team from the parts E in the same construction site of this case, located in Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun (21:30 on January 15, 2014) in excess of 306, which is the well-being of the human parts at the construction site of this case located in Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun-gun (24cm in total length, 13cm in length in total) to the left-hand part and the complete part in need of 12 weeks treatment.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

On February 25, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the injury was caused by occupational accident and applied for medical care to the Defendant.

On April 1, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition not to grant medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “the instant accident occurred during the construction site after the completion of the work at the construction site and while drinking at a house located away from the construction site, and cannot be recognized as a private accident due to the emotional deterioration with the same worker.”

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (if there are virtual numbers, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was in charge of duties of a nature that may cause a third party's harmful act in the position of the team leader with the authority to manage and employ the position of the team leader, which is the cause of the team, and since E is realizing the risk with a knife, the plaintiff's injury suffered by the accident of this case is conducted by the plaintiff.