logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.10.30 2014고정304
상해
Text

A fine of KRW 500,00 shall be imposed on the first offense in the judgment of the defendant, and a fine of KRW 2,50,000 shall be imposed on the second offense in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. [2014 high-level 304] On February 14, 2014, the Jeju District Court sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for one year for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 22, 2014.

On October 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 04:58, at the D cafeteria located in Jeju Island, the victim E (53 years of age) tried to leep the Defendant’s eye due to the salted so that the Defendant tried to do so; (b) tried to lick up from the restaurant to the outside of the restaurant; and (c) tried to lick up the snow due to the salted fish; (d) the Defendant’s face to lick up the Defendant’s hand, etc.; (b) laid the victim lick up on the floor to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right; and (c) laid the victim 3 to four times

2. [2014 Highest 640] On April 19, 2014, the Defendant expressed that “F” main points in Jeju-si, “F” in Jeju-si, on the ground that an employee G (n, 42 years of age), who is an employee, was frighting to speak for the owner of a business under the influence of alcohol, he/she was frighted, and expressed his/her desire to “the fright, governance, fright to fright to fright inside, and fright to fright within, fright to fright to fright to fright the victim’s left arms, and caused the victim’s injury, such as salt fright, tension, etc., on the left left side, which requires two-time medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 High Court Decision 304]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused and E;

1. Each photograph and diagnostic document;

1. Reference letter, report on the failure of disposition, and report on the result of confirmation (2014 highest 640);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement of H;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Handling concurrent crimes: The latter part of Articles 37 and 39 (1) (former part) of the Criminal Act (former part) (former part) and the main sentence of Article 39 (1) (former part) of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 of the Criminal Act;

arrow