The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is contrary to the recognition of the crime.

It agreed with the victim of special assault and damage to property.

However, there are a number of criminal records including criminal records.

In particular, the crime of this case was committed during the same repeated crime period.

A person who has already been punished by a fine for the same crime committed during the period of repeated crime but has been punished by a second offense.

The judgment below

There is no change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing thereafter.

In full view of other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in records and pleadings, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.