A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 23, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Western District Court on February 23, 201, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months in imprisonment with labor for the same crime in the same court on June 20, 2013.

On March 12, 2017, the Defendant driven a Ccoon car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.134% from the section of approximately 1km to the road in front of the inspection station in front of the same line, which is located in the middle of the common infridong-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul, to the road in front of the inspection station in the middle of the same line.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the duty of prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol under the Road Traffic Act not less than twice, but driven a motor vehicle under the influence of re-driving.

2. The Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a car in CCo.

On March 12, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph 1, around 19:30, and continued to drive the said car at a speed of about 30 km per hour according to the speed of 161-24, which is located in the Cunyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, the running route of the vehicle at a speed of 161-24.

At the time, there is a night and a place where the center line of the yellow real-line is installed, so there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in the vehicle driving has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the vehicle in the front and the vehicle is safely operated.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not avoid the victim D(41 S) driving e-car driven at the opposite vehicle line due to the negligence of driving the center line by neglecting the influence of alcohol, and did not avoid it. The Defendant received the above d-car e-car from the left-hand e-car with the Defendant’s car e-car, which was set up on the right-hand side of the above road, and caused the said d- car to be driven by the said d-car.

Ultimately, the Defendant is above.