1. The Defendant’s payment to the Plaintiffs as stated in the “request amount” column in the attached Table 1 sheet, and as to the money, from June 15, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 26, 2001, the Defendant obtained approval of the business plan under Article 33 of the former Housing Construction Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 6655 of Feb. 4, 2002) and Article 32 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 17816 of Dec. 26, 2002), and thereafter constructed 14 apartment houses 802 units, a public constructor, on the land of 30,963 square meters of the National Housing Fund.

B. Plaintiff A was written on December 13, 2001; Plaintiff B was written on December 17, 2001; Plaintiff C was written on October 14, 2003; Plaintiff D was written on July 18, 2003; Plaintiff E was written on December 15, 201; Plaintiff F was written on December 9, 2007; Plaintiff G was written on August 17, 2002; Plaintiff H was written on September 3, 2007; Plaintiff J was written on April 10, 2008; Plaintiff J was finally written on September 3, 2008; Plaintiff C was written on July 3, 2008; and Plaintiff C was written on September 13, 2008; and each of the “after the lease deposit amount” was changed from each of the Plaintiff’s respective apartment units “after the lease deposit amount.”

(hereinafter “each lease deposit of this case”). C.

On August 28, 2003, the defendant extended a loan from the National Housing Fund to the National Housing Fund with respect to each apartment of this case (hereinafter "each apartment of this case").

As of the date of closing argument of the instant case, the amount of secured debt of each of the instant mortgages is as stated in the National Housing Fund column in attached Table 1.

(hereinafter “each of the instant loans”) D.

On October 4, 2010, pursuant to Article 21(3) of the former Rental Housing Act (amended by Act No. 10463, Mar. 9, 2011; hereinafter the same) (amended by Act No. 10463, Mar. 9, 201; hereinafter the same), the Plaintiffs filed an application for approval for conversion of each apartment unit of this case with the Mayor of Yeongdeungpopo City. The Bapo City (amended by Presidential Decree No. 22689, Mar. 2, 201) shall undergo an appraisal under Article 23 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.