The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not err in violation of the signal.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of suspended sentence on May) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The summary of the instant facts charged was around 21:20 on April 10, 2013, the Defendant driven a G rocketing car and driven a four-lane road in the first place in the Ch in the Ch in the Ch in the Chh in the direction of the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic 70km along the speed of the ethic ethic ethic

At the time, there was a night and there was a duty of care for drivers to reduce speed and drive safely according to their signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not neglect that the vehicle progress signal is changed to a stop signal, and was driven by the victim J(50 years of age) who was driven by the victim J(50 years of age) pursuant to the left turn turn at the right turn from the opposite side of the vehicle at the right turn.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence, the injury of the victimJ, such as the necessary chronronon for about 8 weeks of treatment, and the injury of the victim L(the age of 43) who was on board the said knife in the said knife for about 2 weeks of treatment; the injury of the victim M&(the age of 39) who was on board the said knife for about 6 weeks of treatment; and the injury of the knife for about 10 weeks of treatment of the said knife at least 63 years of age; and the injury of the victim N(the age of 63) who was on the knife in the said knife for about 6

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of all the evidence as indicated in its judgment.

C. The key issue of this case is whether the defendant violated a signal signal, and as evidence to acknowledge this, the victim J, N's investigative agencies, and court of original instance respectively.