Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 23, 2014, C obstructed the performance of official duties in such a way as to take the sexual organ before the police officer called out after receiving a 112 report from the Daegu District Court on December 23, 2014, and to view the change of the police officer’s boom.

In the trial process, C denied the intention of obstructing the performance of official duties to the effect that “at the time of multiple urology, police officers were unable to be fluort, and the police officers were not able to have a fluorily sent,” and applied for witness of the situation as an employee of the restaurant operated by C.

2. On March 25, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness of C on the second day of the 2nd instance of the Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties in the Daegu Suwon-dong District Court No. 4, Daegu-dong District Court No. 2014Kadan6470, the Defendant testified and took an oath.

In giving testimony, the Defendant testified to the question of “C’s defense counsel’s “I will see to the police officer that it is extremely difficult for C to do so,” and ② the prosecutor testified to the question of “C to whom C would have come to be satisfy, fy, rice, etc.” that “C asked to be satisfyed to be satched to be satched to be satched to be satfy to the satch,” and ③ the prosecutor testified to the question of “C’s satfy that it is difficult for C to be satfy to be satched to be satisfyed to be satched to be satisfy.”

However, the facts C, however, did not state that police officers dispatched to the scene at the time did not take her own flusium, but did not her flusium to police officers at the time, and there was no fact that police officers at the time did her flusium to flusium that her flusium was flusent, or that police officers did her flusium to her b

Nevertheless, the defendant is guilty of the above C.