A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a ballon bareboat cargo vehicle, in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving).

On August 24, 2013, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.192% without a driver's license on August 24, 2013, and proceeded along two-lanes in front of the midwife distance in Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, with the two-lanes of the two-lane roads in front of the midwife distance in the Hanyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun.

At all times, a person engaged in driving along an intersection with a signal apparatus installed on the front side has a duty of care to safely drive by checking well the right and the right according to the direction of the signal apparatus on the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the parts adjacent to the right side of the E K3-car driven by the victim D(30 years of age) who had left to the left under normal signals in the opposite direction by negligence in violation of the suspension signal of the signal apparatus as it is, but instead, in the front part of the above cargo vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence the injury of the victim F (the 32 years old), who is the passenger of the said K3 car, such as dynasium and tension at the bones of wood, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the injury of the victim G (the 58 years old), who is the same passenger, requiring approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, to “the dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynas

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as a holder of Cgallon 2 Ballon, operated the foregoing cargo vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each statement of G and F preparation (simplified);

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A written instruction from an employer;