logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고단6506
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A around October 14, 2013: (a) around 23:30 on October 14, 2013, the head of Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu, and (b) on the grounds that the victim G (Nam, 56 years of age) who is an employee of the head of the party branch did not guide the party branch as desired by the Defendant, the Defendant and the Defendant were satisfing and pushed down the victim’s boom by sating the ebbbbbage, sating the victim’s satisf, and the above H was satd with the victim’s satisf and sating the f

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim in common with H and interfered with the operation of the victim party room.

2. The Defendants’ co-offenders, who were called up after receiving the report that they would escape the disturbance as stated in the preceding paragraph at the time, place, and in the preceding paragraph, and Defendant A attempted to arrest Defendant A in the act of committing a crime by attaching I’s title to the Defendant A, and Defendant B removed the dog attached to I’s son’s son’s knife at three times, with his son’s son’s bomb, and attached I’s son’s son’s neck.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers.

3. Defendant B, at the time, at the place, at the time, and at the place, where the preceding paragraph is recorded, Defendant B, at the place where the party room employees, G and the party room customers are located, called “I have been developed by the country due to the same police, Domine, Franchi, and Franchi,” and then, at the K box located in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims by “I and L in this franchise, franchise, franchise, franchise, and franchise, franchise, and franchise.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police protocol of statement against G, M, and N;

1. Some police interrogation protocol of H;

1. Each statement of I, L, andO;

1. The provisions of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the photographs of damaged police officers on the part of the damaged police officers, and the photographs of the saturgic body;

arrow