The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In light of the following: (a) the summary of the Defendant’s grounds for appeal (unfair form of punishment) recognizes that the Defendant committed the instant crime on a contingent basis; (b) expresses his/her intent not to have the Defendant punished; (c) the Defendant did not have any history of criminal punishment; and (d) received sexual assault prevention programs to prevent recidivism; and (b) the lower court’s sentence imposing fines of KRW 1,00,000; and (c) imposed orders to complete sexual assault treatment programs for eight hours is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The crime of this case is not clear that the defendant committed an indecent act by her her m and her m and her m and her m and her m and her m and her m and her m and her m and m and her m. in light of the part and method of the indecent act. The circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal are already reflected in the court below's favorable sentencing factors and there are no special changes in circumstances that may be taken into account in the trial, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered to be too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

Judgment

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.