logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.11.27 2018고단1667
사기등
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year for each of the crimes specified in the judgment of the court below, and Articles 3, 5, 9, and 14.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On April 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual fraud at the closing branch of the Yongsan District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on November 19, 2016. On November 21, 2018, the Changwon District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Changwon District Court on September 19, 2017, and the execution of the sentence became final and conclusive on November 29, 2018.

1. [Attachment 2018 Highest 1667]

A. On November 29, 2017, the Defendant concluded that “A child is in an emergency room in the hospital, and there is no medical expenses,” to the victim D working as an employee at the convenience store in Busan Metropolitan Government B, on November 29, 2017.”

However, the defendant did not have any open source, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2.10,00 from the victim as the borrowed money.

B. On November 30, 2017, around 06:30 on November 30, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G working as an employee, stating, “I wish to pay back money if I lend money. I wish to lend money.”

However, the defendant did not have an open child, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to pay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 550,00 from the victim as the borrowed money.

C. Around 02:40 on December 1, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim K, working as an employee, stating that “I would pay back immediately if I borrowed the birth treatment and the tea cost in order to work at a construction site located in the Changwon.”

However, there is no difference between the defendant and the defendant, and the defendant is the victim.

arrow