logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.24 2011고정5642
관세법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

While exporting finished products of heavy equipment, the Defendant filed a false report on the quantity of the parts that are exported for the convenience of customs clearance, etc., and used used used equipment to export used goods in a bill of lading by stating the finished products as transporting the finished products.

On July 28, 2006, the defendant filed a false report as if he were exported of high-class 1 US$17,730 (16,772,402 US$16,730), while the defendant exported high-class 1 US$17,730 (16,772,402 USE ECAVVS) through Incheon on August 1, 2006, through the multimodal freight forwarder C's D, which was located in the main city located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

3. 4. As described above, all of the goods are reported to the customs collector as different goods, and used double-equipment 19,354,954 won were sealed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. A written accusation;

1. Report on the offender's domicile;

1. Application of export declarations and shipping documents statutes

1. Article 269 (3) 2 of the Customs Act and Article 241 (1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment for Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 282 (2) and (3) of the Customs Act;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant exported finished products of heavy equipment, while filing a false report on the quantity of the parts exported for the convenience of customs clearance, etc., and subsequently, the Defendant had the intention to closely export heavy equipment by stating the finished products as the transportation of finished products in the bill of lading.

The defendant is in Seoul Customs Office in Gangnam-gu Seoul on July 14, 2006, through D of the complex freight forwarding company C, and the facts of the complex freight forwarding company OLD & USED.

arrow