logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.14 2014나207
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this Court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and the reasons for this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases: (a) the third to fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【In light of the fact that the part of the wall of the first floor of this case, which is the boundary of the part over the crime of this case, is presumed to have been constructed recently according to the result of the appraisal of the building by the appraiser G at the trial, it is not sufficient to recognize that the plaintiff succeeded to the possession of the former occupant at the court of the first instance and continued possession of the part over 20 years after the plaintiff succeeded to the possession of the former occupant at the court of the first instance, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow