The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special robbery) in the judgment of the court below in the misconception of facts, the defendant had an intentional robbery but had no intentional rape.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (five years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court may recognize that the Defendant had the intent to rape at the time of committing the crime of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special robbery

① On August 29, 2019, in relation to the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Special Robbery) at the time of interrogation by the prosecution on August 29, 2019, the Defendant stated that he/she had fledd with the victim H at the time and attempted to rape after preventing resistance, but the said victim had fledd and attempted to commit rape, and that he/she had attempted to commit rape.

(증거기록 179쪽). 피고인은 2019. 9. 3. 검찰 2회 피의자신문에서도 “돈을 빼앗으려고 하였으나 피해자가 저항을 하여 돈을 빼앗지는 못하였고, 피해자와 서로 몸싸움을 하던 중 피해자의 얼굴을 보았는데, 약간 예뻤다. 그래서 피해자와 성관계라도 해야겠다는 생각이 들었다. 그 후 또 다시 피해자가 손가락을 이로 물을 수 있을 것 같아 가방에 있던 장갑을 꺼내 장갑을 끼고 피해자의 입을 막고 ‘소리지르지 마, 조용히 해’라고 말을 하며, 피해자의 몸 뒤에서 피해자를 안듯이 일으켜 세운 후 골목 안으로 끌고 가려고 하였는데, 피해자가 ‘잘못했어요’라는 말을 하고 비명을 질렀으며, 그 순간 당황도 되고 피해자의 팔에서 땀이 나서 더 이상 잡고 있을 수 없었다. 그래서 피해자를 놓아 주었는데, 그 사이 피해자가 그 자리를 떠났다.”,...