logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고단5294
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at the early February 2011, contributed the victim D’s “C” film history office operated by the Defendant located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “C”) to “F”, and assist the victim D to grow up with a film news by raising the film production conference.

An investment of KRW 50 million is made in the tephical film that will not be guaranteed until the early contribution and the presentation of film production.

Since motion pictures were taken around 6 to 7 months on the date of shooting, if you come to string, the motion picture will be terminated, and the principal will be guaranteed, and if you open a condition motion picture.

First of all, the investors return the principal of the investment, and if the film shows, the profits will be added, and the damages will not be absolute.

“.......”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not pay the film investment amount agreed by the investors at the time, and operated a film company by means of bonds or credit card loans. Thus, even if the Defendant received an investment from the damaged party, he did not intend to produce “F” film and contribute it to E, or to contribute it to the victim, or did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and profit of the investment amount to the victim

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and was remitted KRW 20 million from the victim to the victim under the pretext of investment around February 14, 201.

2. According to the evidence duly examined by this court, the victim was introduced by the non-resident of the name of the entertainment business in September 2010 and met with E who is his/her father. After the completion of the interview, the victim demanded 50,000 won from the victim's "the cost or the cost or the cost of the introduction of the film" in the absence of the defendant (the page No. 2, 11, and E witness record page No. 1, 2). After the above meeting, the victim was in the state of being separated from the husband at the time of the meeting, and was in the economic condition.

arrow