1. The Defendant’s each point of the attached Form 16, 17, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 16, among the land size of 397 square meters prior to Jinju land C, is indicated as the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The network D (hereinafter “the network”).

On March 30, 2001, the Defendant was divided into KRW 1,342 square meters (for the land above, KRW 455 square meters prior to F on June 24, 2013) prior to the partition and left 887 square meters.

hereinafter referred to as “E land”).

(C) 397 square meters prior to C (hereinafter “C land”)

(2) At the time of the registration of ownership transfer on the same day, the Deceased continued to possess without delivering to the Defendant any portion of 83 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “the instant portion of land in dispute”) connected with the Defendant in sequence of the indication of the attached drawing Nos. 16, 17, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 16 of the attached drawing Nos. 16, 17, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 16 of the land. On April 11, 2002, the Deceased was prepared and delivered by the Defendant a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

B. On February 25, 2003, the Deceased died. At the time of the death, the deceased, who was the wife, the Plaintiff, H, I, and J. However, on May 2018, the above inheritors agreed on the division of inherited property solely to inherit all of the legal relationships, such as the deceased’s possession of approximately twenty-five of the land among C, around May 2018.

[Ground of recognition] A, A’s evidence 1-2, 3, A’s evidence 2 (the Defendant’s name may be presumed to have been duly recorded, in full view of the sales contract of this case, appraiser K’s appraisal result, and the overall purport of the pleadings), A’s evidence 3-1, 2, A’s evidence 4-1, 2, 3, 5-1, 6-2, A’s evidence 9, 11-1, 7, 10-1, 2-2, and 2 of the evidence, and the entire purport of the pleadings, and the entire purport of the pleadings as a whole.

2. The following circumstances, i.e., (i) where the authenticity of a disposal document is recognized, the court may deny the contents of the statement.