logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2017.11.15 2016가단113957
양수금 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s claim 1) Our bank is a D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) company.

(2) On February 29, 2016, the court issued a payment order against the non-party company and C to the extent of KRW 428,00,000 and KRW 428,00,000,000 to KRW 99,00,000 and KRW 15% per annum from February 19, 2016 to the full payment order against the non-party company and C. The court issued a payment order against the non-party company and C to the effect that "the non-party company and C shall jointly and severally pay the above amount of KRW 9,00,00,000 to KRW 15% per annum from February 19, 2016 to the full payment order."

B. As to the non-party company and the non-party company A, the non-party company was established for the purpose of mobile communication equipment Do, retail, and mobile communication equipment service at the Namyang-si, and was established for the purpose of mobile communication equipment Do, retail, and mobile communication equipment service, and the representative director F and the auditor C were the main officers, and the dissolution was ordered pursuant to Article 520-2(1) of the Commercial Act on December 1, 2015.

On the other hand, Defendant B, and auditor G are children of C and are currently residing in the same domicile.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute between the parties, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10, Gap evidence No. 13, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 5, and 6.

arrow