The judgment below

The guilty part shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine shall be imposed on the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 ⑴ 사실 오인 내지 법리 오해 ㈎ 각 업무 방해의 점에 대하여 1) 2012. 12. 1. 경 업무 방해의 점 피고인의 행위는 당시 피고인의 펜 션 운영을 방해하는 피해자들에게 항의하기 위한 것에 불과하므로 형법 제 20조 소정의 정당행위에 해당한다.

2) On July 4, 2014, the Defendant sought interference with business around 19:35 on the same day from the date to the victim’s pension. It was intended to resist that the victim I interfered with the Defendant’s business, and at the time, the Defendant sought the victim’s pension in order to resist the Defendant’s accident twice thereafter.

The Defendant had no gravel as stated in the facts charged at around 24:00 on the same day. The Defendant’s sound-friendly act does not constitute the threat of interference with business affairs, and even if the Defendant’s act constitutes the threat of interference with business affairs, it constitutes a legitimate act as provided in Article 20 of the Criminal Act, even if it constitutes the threat of interference with business affairs.

3) Around July 5, 2014 and around July 7, 2014, the Defendant sought violence from the victims to talk with the victims who denies the use of the assault. The Defendant’s sound-friendly act does not constitute a force of interference with business affairs, and even if the Defendant’s act constitutes a force of interference with business affairs, it constitutes a legitimate act as provided in Article 20 of the Criminal Act by considerable action against the victims’ assault.

㈏ 각 상해의 점에 대하여 1) 2014. 7. 4. 경 피해자 N에 대한 상해의 점 피고인은 2014. 7. 4. 22:47 경 피해자 N로부터 폭행을 당하여 저항한 사실이 있을 뿐, 이 부분 공소사실 기재와 같이 피해자 N를 폭행한 사실이 없다.

2) On July 4, 2014, the Defendant suffered an injury to the victim I.