logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2019.10.23 2019나50586
종중총회결의무효확인
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a case where the judgment was accepted as follows. Thus, it is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil

The fourth 20 to five parallels in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed as follows.

2) The general members of the defendant clan are 190 persons listed in the list of the members of the clan (No. 15), and the defendant clan sent a muster notice to 186 persons except three persons (I, G, and J) who led the convening of the special general meeting of this case and three other persons, by mail.

Even if the above 190 persons and the above 190 persons were omitted by mail in the notice of convening an extraordinary general meeting of this case, the above 3 persons were family members of the above 3 persons who led the convening of the general meeting of this case, and thus the above 3 persons were not able to know the address, so the call notice was not sent by mail.

In addition, the above three members posted the fact of holding the special general meeting of this case in the AC Press and AD Press for the clans who are aware of contact information.

Therefore, there is no defect in the convocation notice in the special general meeting of this case.

The 6th 21-8th 21th 21th 1th 2th 1th 1th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2nd 190 members of the Defendant’s clan, which is indicated in the 190th 15th 15th 190 members of the Defendant’s clan, and even if there was no mail for the notification of convening the general meeting, the above AI is different from the above

It argues that “....”

However, as of July 28, 2014, 191 members of the defendant clan including AI who is a member of the Dong, including the above three members of the defendant clan. As seen earlier, the contact point is the three members even if the above AI is different from the above three members who led the convening of the special general meeting of this case as of the defendant clan's assertion.

arrow