logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.06.27 2012고단3140
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and three months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 2012, 2012, the Defendant, in Dda located in Hasan-si, Hasan-si, Dda-si, E, one of the parties to friendly ties with friendly ties. On that basis, the Defendant, along with the Defendant’s desire to her pets from F (the age of 60) to her pets, went off to the above multiples, and was assaulted on two occasions. The Defendant, due to a sudden accident, had no more than two her left hand, and had the victim her her pets, and had the victim her pets.

At around 21:00 on August 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sought the said Dda bank from the victim located there; (b) however, the victim’s knifeed the head by drinking the knife by leading him to the outside of the multiple bank by cutting off the flife and cutting off the flife, and (c) the knife, which is a dangerous object in the Defendant’s vehicle parked in front of the other side; and (d) the victim’s knife the knife of the knife (33cm in total length, 20cm in knife length) toward the victim; and (d) the victim’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the police of the F;

1. Photographs;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on investigation (Attachment of knific photo), photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the entrustment and reply;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da1548, Apr. 2, 2007; Supreme Court Decision 2007Da11448, Apr. 2,

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

arrow