(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.11.03 2016고단1380

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.11.03 2016고단1380

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

At around 2:20 on August 17, 2016, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E (the 36-year-old) and the shoulder, etc. on the ground that the Defendant was faced with the victim E (the 36-year-old age) who is a customer, and the shoulder, on the ground that he was faced with the victim, the Defendant got off the face of the victim two times by drinking home, and suffered injury, such as a patha, which requires the victim to provide approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (referring to the entrustment and response to a dental hospital, relation to the number of days of diagnosis, relation to the attachment of CCTV data, and relation to photographs of damaged parts);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not only the period of repeated crime and suspended execution, but also the defendant, who had been punished for the same kind of crime, committed the crime of this case without permission, and therefore, there is a possibility of criticism. However, it appears that the defendant committed the crime of this case in depth and in depth, it appears that the defendant committed the crime of this case with the trial expense attached thereto, and that the victim was paid KRW 10,000,00 to the victim immediately after the crime was committed, and the victim submitted a written application to the effect that the victim would have disturbed his wife against the defendant, and that the disaster prevention person who committed the defendant's marriage was leading and edification the defendant, and all other favorable circumstances such as the defendant's health condition, the whole circumstance and result of the crime of this case, etc. shall be determined as the sentence of this case as ordered.

참조조문

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2016.10.27 2016고단1321

-전주지방법원 2016.10.27 2016고단1413

-전주지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고단1346

-창원지방법원 2020.05.15 2019노2243

-창원지방법원 2020.05.22 2020노340