logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.01.22 2015노1740
위증
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The respective sentence of the court below (Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months and Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for 2 months) against the Defendants in summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants’ confessions and reflects the instant crime, and the fact that Defendant B ought to consider the balance of punishment with the case where the judgment is rendered simultaneously with the crime of forging foreign currency as indicated in the judgment below that became final and conclusive with respect to Defendant B, etc. is an element of sentencing favorable to

However, perjury is a serious crime that makes it difficult to discover the truth of the substance and disturbs the judicial order. The Defendants testified by specifically writing out false facts as stated in the reasoning, which are directly related to the facts charged against D upon the request of the Defendant D, which is a criminal case. The nature of the crime is inferior, Defendant A committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period, and there is no change of circumstances that may be specially considered in the sentencing factors unfavorable to the Defendants, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, the process and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court against the Defendants is adequate.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow