logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2020.04.29 2019고정70
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motorcycle B.

On January 15, 2019, the Defendant driven the above motorcycle around 18:10 on January 15, 2019, and continued to run from the apartment complex C to the private distance slope.

At the same time, the pedestrian signal, etc. was installed, so there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a vehicle gets on a crosswalk and safely proceed with the accident and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded along as it was, and the Defendant brought the victim D (the age of 61) who was standing on the left side of the direction of the proceeding with the front wheels of the motor bicycle driving by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the mouth flasing down (closed) on the 5th left-hand side in need of approximately six weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on actual condition investigation, and a report on investigation (F testimony of the shooting range F);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to a provisional payment order is that the defendant has shocked pedestrians who walk the crosswalk in violation of the new subparagraph, and the defendant's negligence is heavy, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim is not less than that of the victim, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions.

arrow