beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The Defendants asserted that they were elected by the president and the president of the Plaintiff at early 2009, while serving in their positions, excessively spent 100,000,000 won out of the Plaintiff’s funds as attorney’s fees, thereby causing enormous damages to the Plaintiff. The Defendants embezzled KRW 82,660,00 in total, KRW 75,00,000, and KRW 7,660,000 in farmland cultivation expenses, which are the Plaintiff’s property, and KRW 82,660,00 in total, and KRW 82,60,000 in total, and KRW 82,660,00 in the farmland cultivation expenses, etc., for four years from 209 to 2012, and embezzled KRW 109,063,111, which were kept in the passbook in the name of the Plaintiff. The Defendants did not return KRW 29,00,000 in the passbook in the name of the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 320,723,11 (i.e., KRW 100,000,000, KRW 82,660,000, KRW 109,063, KRW 111, KRW 29,000,000) and damages for delay.
2. Determination
A. In light of the purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the attorney’s appointment fee in Gap evidence No. 2, the Defendants’ assertion as to the Plaintiff’s president and general secretary may be acknowledged as having spent KRW 100,000,000 at the Plaintiff’s attorney’s expense on or around 209. However, the following circumstances can be revealed by adding the entire purport of the pleading to the Plaintiff’s statement No. 1 and No. 2 (including the number number; hereinafter the same shall apply). In other words, the Defendants confirmed that there was procedural defects during the process of selling the Plaintiff’s land during the Fail-si Si-si Ma Ma Ma 115,837 square meters at around July 2003, and confirmed that there was procedural defects during the process of selling the said forest during Fail-si, the Defendants appointed the attorney by filing a lawsuit for cancellation of ownership transfer registration against Fail-si, and that the period was finally reversed and remanded by the court of first instance after May 29, 2009.