logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.16 2017고정385
농어촌정비법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall illegally occupy or use agricultural production infrastructure.

Nevertheless, on May 2016, the Defendant illegally occupied the agricultural production infrastructure by constructing stone 737 square meters in agricultural production infrastructure or reclaiming sand from around November 2016, as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, from around 2,080 square meters, which was designated as a road, which is an agricultural production infrastructure, around 2,080 square meters.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs attached to the accusation;

1. Application of investigation reports and certificates of registration of agricultural infrastructure attached thereto to the investigation reports;

1. Article 130 (3) and Article 18 (3) 3 of the Non-Act on Agriculture and Fishing Villages, which are applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is recognized that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though it is recognized that the defendant led to a confession, reflects, and makes efforts to restore to the original state, is subject to the fines specified in the summary order, even if all of the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, criminal records, criminal records, means and results, are considered.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

arrow