1. The part against Defendant B in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

Defendant B shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 99,500,000 and this.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Defendant B’s implementation process of the instant project refers to the Plaintiff’s “instant land” in total, including the aforementioned land, c, D, E, and F (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”).

(2) The project of collecting earth and stone (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”) shall be

(2) Defendant B promoted the instant project: (a) around June 24, 201, around G and the instant land, the actual owner of the instant land, concluded a sales contract with G and the instant land; and (b) agreed to enter into the said lease contract with respect to the said C in the future; and (c) on June 27, 2011, Defendant B entered into a contract for civil engineering and design services to obtain permission for collection of soil and stones with the Defendant limited partnership (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) in the name of H Co., Ltd., the representative director of which was the Plaintiff.

B. On August 23, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff agreed to make an investment of KRW 150 million in the instant business on August 23, 2013 (hereinafter “instant investment agreement”).

)하고, 같은 날 투자금 중 9,950만원을 직접 피고 회사에 용역비로 지급하였다. 그러면서 원고는 2013. 8. 23. 피고 회사와 사이에 “이 사건 토지의 공장창업승인 및 토석채취허가를 위한 측량설계 용역을 함에 있어 법적 문제에 대하여는 피고 회사가 책임을 질 것이며 다만 민원해결은 원고가 책임을 질 것을 쌍방 합의합니다. 피고 회사가 위의 내용과 틀리게 인허가를 득하지 못할 시에는 용역비를 사업자에게 돌려 줄 것을 확인합니다.”라는 내용의 쌍방합의서를 작성하였다. 2) 피고 회사는 2013. 10. 10.경 이 사건 토지에 관한 측량설계 용역을 마쳤으나, 이 사건 토지의 소유권을 취득하거나 토지사용승낙을 ``받지 못하여 이 사건 토지에 관한 토석채취허가를 받지 못하였다.

C. The Plaintiff prepared the instant confirmation document shall proceed properly with the instant project.