Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a representative director of Defendant B, and Defendant B is a corporation that operates the above company, and Defendant B is a corporation that manages bus advertising, bus wheel chairs, and typists.

1. No defendant A may receive a tax invoice without being supplied with any goods or services under the Value-Added Tax Act;

Nevertheless, around June 30, 2009, he received 65 copies of the tax invoice of KRW 15,000,000 from the case by mail and received 15,000 from the case without being supplied with goods or services within the B office located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and received 65 copies of the tax invoice of KRW 1,771,50,283 from the case as shown in the attached list of crimes, such as the receipt of one tax invoice of KRW 15,00 from the case by mail.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. committed the same act of violation as described in the preceding paragraph with respect to Defendant B’s business at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph by Defendant B, an operator.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. The Defendants and defense counsel asserted that the TRS contract was concluded between Company B and KT in 2009, and that the TR contract was concluded between Company B and KT in 2009, and that it was supplied with tynael and wheel chairs via TTSS, Inc., Ltd., the partner company in the KT, and thus, the tax invoice was not received even if the goods were not supplied.

However, according to the above evidence duly adopted and examined, part of the amount paid to Dooel Co., Ltd., a partner, with the purchase price of Doo and wheel chairs Co., Ltd., Defendant B.