1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 16, 2010, the Plaintiff married with a foreigner of Vietnam who is a national of the Republic of Korea on August 16, 2010, and entered the Republic of Korea for the first time on October 17 of the same year and was granted a stay permit in the capacity of the spouse of the citizen.

In addition, the Plaintiff continued to obtain permission to stay in the capacity of the spouse of the citizen after entering the Republic of Korea as above, and on October 2, 2015, obtained permission to stay as of October 17, 2017.

B. On March 5, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for simplified naturalization pursuant to Article 6(2)1 of the Nationality Act to the Defendant.

C. On November 21, 2016, the Plaintiff was issued a summary order of KRW 300,000 (200,12290) and paid the said fine on December 14, 2012 on the ground that the Plaintiff driven a road of approximately four kilometers on the front side of Suwon-si, Gwangju-si, from around August 29, 2016, to the front side of Gwangju-si, without a motorcycle driver’s license.

On May 31, 2017, the defendant rendered a decision to deny the plaintiff's naturalization on the ground that the defendant was a good behavior due to the plaintiff's criminal records.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). [Grounds for recognition] The Disposition in this case is without dispute; Gap evidence 1 to 3; Eul evidence 1 to 6 (including paper numbers); and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion did not commit any illegal act other than the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) at issue in the disposition of this case, and the plaintiff was driving only once again on the road that comes back to his house in the market, and the facts constituting the crime are minor. The plaintiff also cooperates with and cooperates in his mistake in the investigation process and paid all fines, and the plaintiff has a firm foundation for living in the Republic of Korea for seven years after her spouse was married.