Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a kind of the victim C(the age of 57) in the Eastern War.

On March 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 00:0 on March 00, 2016, the Defendant took the victim’s bath in the Esing room located on the first floor of Pyeongtaek-si D, on the ground that the victim took a bath while drinking with the victim; (b) took the victim’s bath, and (c) took the victim’s face over the floor, and took the victim’s face by drinking it.

As a result, the Defendant placed the victim a eyebrow on the left side of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination on the application of the O sentencing guidelines for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to a provisional payment order: The portion not guilty (the portion carrying dangerous articles) by considering all the circumstances, such as the non-applicable victim's transfer to the same class and the agreed fact;

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 00:0 on March 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 00:0, at the Esing room located on the fourth floor of Pyeongtaek-si D, for the reason that the victim took a bath while drinking with the victim; (b) the Defendant singing the victim’s neck by hand on the part of the victim; and (c) the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous article on the table of the table, boomed the victim’s boom and boomed the victim’s face; and (d) when the victim booms the victim’s boom, and b

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things with the victim and put the victim at the left eyebrow for treatment days.

2. According to the records of the board, the victim himself/herself was fighting with the body of the beer who was faced with the beer, and made a statement by the beer without memory as to whether he/she was faced with the beer, and the beer's disease was not confirmed at the site. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the part that the defendant suffered injury due to beer's wound at the time of the beer's death.