All convictions in the judgment of the court of first instance and the judgment of the court of second instance shall be reversed.

Defendant 5,000,000 won.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 제1 원심판결과 관련하여(피고인) ㈎ 사실오인 및 법리오해 제1 원심판결은 다음과 같은 사실오인 및 법리오해로 인하여 판결에 영향을 미친 위법이 있다.

(1) No. 1-

(a)With respect to paragraphs (f) through (f): the particulars written by the Defendant in each article are not false but true;

Even if the contents are false facts, there is a reasonable reason to believe that the defendant is true, and it is about the public interest of the normal operation of the church of this case, so the illegality should be avoided as a justifiable act.

(2) Articles 1-7 (g) and 2-2 of the judgment

(b) and (c);

In relation to the claim, since victims were not specified, there is no crime of defamation and insult against victims.

③ Decision No. 2-

(d) and (e);

In relation to the claim: It is not a separate crime of insult two independently, but a single crime of insult is established as a single single comprehensive crime.

㈏ 양형과중 제1 원심판결이 선고한 형(벌금 500만원)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

나. 제2 원심판결과 관련하여(피고인 및 검사) ⑴ 피고인 ㈎ 사실오인 및 법리오해 ① 각 정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)죄 피고인이 게시한 글은 모두 진실에 기초한 것이다.

Even if some of the facts are false, there was considerable reason to believe them as true, and its contents are for the public interest of the normal operation of the church, so the illegality should be avoided.

② Although the part of the offense of insult posted by the Defendant is somewhat excessive in terms of the expression, in consideration of the overall purport of this article, criticism was made for the normal operation of a church, and thus, it constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate the general rules of society in light of sound social norms.